 Starrett 824 Fixed Range Inside Micrometer 14"-16" US $95.00 
|
 MITUTOYO INSIDE BORE MICROMETER NO. 168 - 204 RANGE 0.5 - 0.6 US $140.00
|
 Mitutoyo 133-228 Tubular Inside Micrometer, 0.001" Resolution, 7-8" Range US $119.99
|
 MITUTOYO INSIDE BORE MICROMETER NO. 268 - 223 RANGE 10 - 11" US $950.00
|
 MITUTOYO INSIDE BORE MICROMETER NO. 268 - 224 RANGE 11 - 12" US $1,050.00
|
 MITUTOYO INSIDE BORE MICROMETER NO. 168 - 222 RANGE 9 - 10" US $875.00
|
 Mitutoyo inside micrometer 345-350 .200 to 1.200 range .00005 reading digit US $300.00
|
 MITUTOYO INSIDE BORE MICROMETER RANGE 0.275 - 0.35" US $130.00
|
 MITUTOYO 141-153 .001" INSIDE MICROMETER SET IN BOX 2-12" RANGE!!!! US $39.95
|
 NICE LUFKIN INSIDE MICROMETER MIC WITH CASE RANGE 2 - 12 INCH BY .001 US $20.00
|
 Starrett 823 Tubular Inside Micrometer Set .001" Graduation, 1-1/2-12" Range US $159.00
|
 STARRETT TUBULAR INSIDE MICROMETER 23"-25" RANGE US $129.95
|
 BROWN & SHARPE INSIDE BORE MICROMETER RANGE 1.2 - 1.4 US $225.00
|
 LARGE MITUTOYO INSIDE BORE MICROMETER RANGE 1.4 - 1.6 -- 11-1/4" LONG !!!! US $265.00
|
 Nice Set of Starrett inside Micrometers Catalog No. 823C Range 4”-24” US $350.00
|
 STARRETT TUBULAR INSIDE MICROMETER 30"-32" RANGE US $134.45
|
 STARRETT TUBULAR INSIDE MICROMETER 22"-24" RANGE US $89.45
|
 BROWN & SHARPE-INSIDE MICROMETER (RANGE 8-9"/.001") US $24.99
|
 STARRETT TUBULAR INSIDE MICROMETER 29"-31" RANGE US $89.45
|
 Starrett 823EZ Tubular Inside Micrometer Set 4 to 24" range NEW FREE SHIPPING US $459.99
|
 Brown & Sharpe Inside Micrometer 9-10 in. Range US $100.00
|
 Starrett Inside Micrometer No. 824 6-7 in. Range US $100.00
|
 Brown and Sharpe Inside Micrometer Range 6-7 in. US $100.00
|
 Fowler Inside Micrometer Range 8-9 in. US $100.00
|
 MITUTOYO INSIDE MICROMETER W/ 5 PROBES RANGE 3.0"-8.0" US $171.00
|
 Mitutoyo Tubular Inside Micrometer Model 233-226, Range 5-6", Resolution .001" US $89.95
|
 Mitutoyo Tubular Inside Micrometer Model 233-229, Range 8-9", Resolution .001" US $99.95
|
 STARRETT 823FZ TUBULAR INSIDE MICROMETER SET IN WOODEN CASE RANGE: 1-1/2" - 32" US $345.00
|
Inside Micrometer Range
Calibration Verification of Micrometer Range 0 25 mm
Landlord Insurance Plans - Is It Really Worth It?
What occurs if a landlord has a problem of a significant water leak inside a rental house? Visualize the buy-to-let house in query was a best floor flat. The outcome was that harm had not just been induced to the carpet in their flat but also to the carpet in the tenanted flat beneath. In addition to the carpet, the ceiling inside the flat beneath had also been damaged resulting inside the plaster bubbling up and falling off.
The house investor who owned the downstairs flat, the landlord was informed by him that the structural harm to the flat beneath was covered by their buildings insurance but meeting the expense of a new carpet would be the upstairs landlord's responsibility.
Who in fact is accountable for the repairs and which landlords insurance policy should be claimed against?
Legal responsibilities in the landlord
Firstly before finding in to the details in the Landlord Insurance policy a landlord should be clear about their responsibility for maintenance of their buy-to-let house underneath the terms of any tenancy agreement.
One of the most essential pieces of legislation governing repairs is the fact that contained inside Section 11 in the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 and which applies to leases or tenancy agreement granted on or after 24th October 1961 for less than seven years.
The vast majority of Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreements are periodic or for terms of less than seven years and therefore Section 11 applies to these tenancy agreements.
The landlords implied obligations underneath Section 11 are:
* To keep in repair the structure and exterior in the dwelling (including drains, gutters and external pipes) to fulfil the tenancy agreement.
* To keep in repair and proper working order the installations inside the dwelling for the supply of water, gas, electricity and sanitation (including basins, sinks, baths and sanitary conveniences) to fulfil the tenancy agreement.
* To keep in repair and proper working order the installations inside the dwelling for room and water heating to fulfil the tenancy agreement.
Within the example given above the landlord would be accountable for the repair in the ceiling as it is part in the structure in the building. The reality is the fact that the ultimate responsibility may not lie with the owner in the leasehold flat. This is because the landlord themselves may only be a leaseholder and it could properly be that it is their landlord, the freeholder or any appointed management company that will ultimately be accountable for carrying out the repair work.
Beneath s.11(2) in the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 the landlord is not accountable for works or repairs for things which the tenant has a duty to use in a tenant-like manner such as carpets or decoration. However, the exact responsibilities may be set out in any explicit terms contained inside the Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement. Therefore, unless otherwise stated inside the Tenancy Agreement; if the water harm resulted inside the carpet or decoration becoming shabby it may be the tenant who is accountable for the repair. The reality though is the fact that when faced with a shabby house and an uncooperative landlord most tenants will ultimately give notice and leave.
Who pays?
The next step for the landlord is to establish who pays for the repairs in both flats.
For a start any landlord insurance on the (upstairs flat) will only cover harm to the landlords flat unless there is block insurance scheme in location. This is likely to be the case where a freeholder and a management company exist who arrange the building insurance for the entire residential block and then recharge each leaseholder for their share in the insurance costs.
Contents insurance may be the responsibility in the individual flat owner or leaseholder. Therefore, providing the landlord has contents cover they is going to be able to claim against the harm induced to the carpet in their best floor flat. The landlord is likely to have liability cover included in their buy-to-let insurance policy, but this is only if it can be proved that they were legally negligent.
This means that underneath the scenario underneath discussion, the only way the landlord in the upstairs flat would have been legally negligent is if the downstairs flat owner "officially" warned the best floor landlord that they had a leak (or something that may cause a potential leak) that could harm the downstairs flat. Then, following this, the best floor landlord ignored this warning and then the leak occurred. In practice, there is almost no chance of this happening as by the time a leak is discovered, the likelihood is the fact that the harm has already been induced. This is therefore classed as an accident as far as the buy-to-let insurer is concerned and therefore would not be the best floor landlord's fault.
Therefore, the house investor who owns the downstairs flat has several options. Firstly, depending on the terms in the tenancy they could insist on their tenant paying for the repair. The tenant if insured could claim on their contents insurance. It may properly be that the insurance company that provides the buildings cover also consists of cover for floor coverings such as carpets inside the policy. This may be the case underneath the policy provided by Alan Boswell's Insurance.
Therefore, where a residential block insurance policy is in location the costs of both carpets could be claimed for together along with the costs of repair to the ceiling. This would have the benefit for both landlords of not having to get into an argument with the tenant about who is accountable for the costs and then for among the parties to have to make a separate claim.
Where this extent of cover is not in location then the house investor may decide to claim off their own buy-to-let insurance. In this case the house investor and owner in the downstairs flat is not likely to be happy, but it is down to them to pursue their insurer for further advice. Their insurer could ultimately pursue the best floor landlord's buy-to-let insurer underneath the negligence clause. The reality is unless the amounts are large and the case clear cut that it is very unlikely to happen. Landlords ought to always remember that a conciliatory approach is likely to produce a more effective long-term solution than an aggressive confrontational one particular.
For more information check out Landlord Insurance
Here are a list of other products on Woodturning Tools, come check these out:
